You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
@ramiroluz
No.
Be aware of that "Indices of green fields must form an arithmetic progression".
In your example the progression (difference from index to index) is first "1" and then "2" and vice versa.
So if the progression between the indices of green fields is not constant, the case has to be excluded.
WGGW -> difference between (green) indices is always "1". -> valid
GGWG -> difference between first and second index is "1", but from second to third index the difference is "2" -> invalid.
:)
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Tile Painting: Revisited!
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
@ramiroluz
No.
Be aware of that "Indices of green fields must form an arithmetic progression".
In your example the progression (difference from index to index) is first "1" and then "2" and vice versa.
So if the progression between the indices of green fields is not constant, the case has to be excluded.
WGGW -> difference between (green) indices is always "1". -> valid
GGWG -> difference between first and second index is "1", but from second to third index the difference is "2" -> invalid.
:)