We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
Am I misunderstanding 'lexicographically smallest'?
The example gives [1, 4, 5, 3, 2] as the answer, but the sequence [1, 2, 5, 4, 3] is lexicographically smaller. Both are 'zig zag sequences' as defined by the problem
Cookie support is required to access HackerRank
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Zig Zag Sequence
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
Am I misunderstanding 'lexicographically smallest'?
The example gives [1, 4, 5, 3, 2] as the answer, but the sequence [1, 2, 5, 4, 3] is lexicographically smaller. Both are 'zig zag sequences' as defined by the problem