We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
Could I get clarification?
I implemented a code and found the cost lower than the one in the example for a new matrix.
For the given matrix:
4 8 2
4 5 7
6 1 6
The matrix below solves it at a lower cost (this is what my code found):
[4, 8, 2]
[4, 4, 6] = cost is 2
[6, 2, 6] = cost is 1
The magic constant is 14 and The cost is 3
Cookie support is required to access HackerRank
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Forming a Magic Square
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
Could I get clarification? I implemented a code and found the cost lower than the one in the example for a new matrix. For the given matrix:
4 8 2
4 5 7
6 1 6
The matrix below solves it at a lower cost (this is what my code found):
[4, 8, 2]
[4, 4, 6] = cost is 2
[6, 2, 6] = cost is 1
The magic constant is 14 and The cost is 3