You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
Pypy will reduce the running time
follwing will not pass on python3 due to the time call and draw back in loops, but pypy will fine.
also, min is time consuming (on calling part) compare to > or < as to my test.
>
<
import itertools as ittls if __name__ == '__main__': road_nodes, road_edges = map(int, input().rstrip().split()) # road_from = [0] * road_edges # road_to = [0] * road_edges # road_weight = [0] * road_edges adjM=[[math.inf]* road_nodes for _ in range(road_nodes)] for i in range(road_nodes): adjM[i][i]=0 for i in range(road_edges): road_from, road_to, road_weight= map(int, input().rstrip().split()) adjM[road_from-1][road_to-1]=road_weight for k, j, i in ittls.permutations(range(road_nodes),3): if adjM[i][j]>adjM[i][k]+adjM[k][j]: adjM[i][j]=adjM[i][k]+adjM[k][j] q = int(input().strip()) for q_itr in range(q): first_multiple_input = input().rstrip().split() x = int(first_multiple_input[0])-1 y = int(first_multiple_input[1])-1 a=adjM[x][y] if a == math.inf: print(-1) else: print(a)
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Floyd : City of Blinding Lights
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
Pypy will reduce the running time
follwing will not pass on python3 due to the time call and draw back in loops, but pypy will fine.
also, min is time consuming (on calling part) compare to
>
or<
as to my test.