We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. Please read our cookie policy for more information about how we use cookies.
Isn't it kind of deciving that in first line geometric progression is described to be (I,J,K) and R where J=R*I and k = R*J and THEN THERE IS A STATEMENT:
** I < J < K**
Which indicates that there is no corner case for r=1 as it would not meet this requirement.
Therefore there shouldn't be test case for R=1 as it does not meet the criteria described at the beggining
Cookie support is required to access HackerRank
Seems like cookies are disabled on this browser, please enable them to open this website
Count Triplets
You are viewing a single comment's thread. Return to all comments →
Isn't it kind of deciving that in first line geometric progression is described to be (I,J,K) and R where J=R*I and k = R*J and THEN THERE IS A STATEMENT:
** I < J < K**
Which indicates that there is no corner case for r=1 as it would not meet this requirement. Therefore there shouldn't be test case for R=1 as it does not meet the criteria described at the beggining